First Alien Messages on my computer screen ../ET/poruke/index.html
http://www.bev.ba/MOMARAFO/ET/poruke/index.html
Will be interesting to inform your self about binary system before read below article.
http://www.bev.ba/MOMARAFO/Xa/binary_numbers.html binary_numbers.html
http://www.bev.ba/MOMARAFO/Xa/converting_sound_into_numbers.html converting_sound_into_numbers.html
WHAT IS FAKE AND FALSE INFORMATION IN BELOW ARTICLE FROM DIFFERENT AUTHORS ABOUT E.B.E. PRESENT ON PLANET EARTH
Vrillon ITN Broadcast Signal Intrusion
http://www.bev.ba/MOMARAFO/ET/vrillion/index.htmlMessage is transmitted as analog TV signal from UK
The Two Messages are also transmitted as analog signal from UK
I. The Chilbolton 'Arecibo message' Formation
A Paul Vigay (RIP) article - additions and correlations by Alexander Light
On Tuesday 21st August 2001 two new crop formations
were reported near Chilbolton radio telescope in Hampshire, UK. Both were very impressive
looking and consisted of a large number of small 'pixels', which when viewed from the air
formed a recognisable shape - unlike many other crop formations.
One represented a 'human face' and the other
resembled a radio transmission that SETI (the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence) sent from the Arecibo radio telescope in 1974.
This latter formation will be examined in this article, in which I hope to not only
describe and explain the original transmission, but also to examine and decode a number of
significant changes occurring in the crop formation.
After speaking to witnesses, it
would appear that the 'Arecibo' formation was created on August 20th. Although I could
roughly make out the binary pattern of the formation from aerial photographs, some aspects
were not quite clear enough to discern individual 'digits'. Therefore I visited both
formations myself (they are about 200m apart in the same field) on
Saturday 25th August 2001."
An interesting interpretation of the 'human face' crop formation comes from researcher
and writer, Wayne Herschel. In his vision, the face resembles that of
the Egyptian Sphinx and Viracocha, a prea-Inca god. But the most
thought-provoking resemblance is to the famous Mars Face.
Credit: Wayne Herschel)
The Arecibo message
"First, I will give some background to
the original message sent from Arecibo, back in 1974. Arecibo is on the northern coast of
Puerto Rico and contains a natural disc-shaped hole in the rock. Inside this bowl was
constructed the world's largest radio-telescope, with a diameter of 1000 feet.
In 1974 a number of modifications had been
carried out to the transmitter, enabling it to broadcast signals at a power of up to 20
terawatts (1 terawatt = 1 trillion watts) and as an inaugural test of these improvements
it was decided by SETI to transmit an encoded message to the heavens. This signal was
aimed towards the globular star cluster M13, some 25,000 light years away and consisting
of some 300,000 stars in the constellation of Hercules.
Why 1679 digits?
The message was actually transmitted on November 16th 1974 and consisted of 1679 pulses of binary code (0's and 1's) - which took a little under three minutes to transmit. It was transmitted on a frequency of 2380MHz (which is significant later).
Here is Rudolf (Boschnjak) Bošnjak comment and
very important information to comprehend and understand
WHAT IS FAKE AND WHAT IS TRUTH.
It was transmitted on a frequency of 2380MHz which
is little below Wi Fi band in present time as is 2380MHz.
Wi-Fi (or WiFi) is a local area wireless computer networking technology that allows electronic devices to network, mainly using the 2.4 gigahertz (12 cm) UHF band.
After explaining how there are several components that make WiFi, you can see how naming a single inventor would be difficult.
First, let's take a look at the history of the 802.11 standard (the radio frequency) used for broadcasting a WiFi signal. Secondly, we have to look at the electronic equipment involved in sending and receiving a WiFi signal, and not surprisingly there are many patents connected with WiFi technology, however, one important patent stands out.
Vic Hayes has been called the "father of Wi-Fi" because he chaired the IEEE committee that created the 802.11 standard in 1997. Before the public even heard of WiFi, Vic Hayes established the standards that would make WiFi feasible. The 802.11 standard was established in 1997. Subsequently, improvements to the network bandwidth were added to the 802.11 standard. That's what the appended letters represent: 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, and more. As a consumer, you should know that the latest version is the best version in terms of performance and is the version you would want all your new equipment to be compatible with.
One key patent for WiFi technology that has won patent litigation lawsuits and does deserve credit belongs to the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) of Australia. CSIRO invented a chip which greatly improved the signal quality of WiFi.
According to PHYSORG, "The invention came out of CSIRO's pioneering work (during the 1990s) in radioastronomy, with a team of its scientists (led by Dr John O'Sullivan) cracking the problem of radio waves bouncing off surfaces indoors, causing an echo that distorts the signal. They overcame it by building a fast chip that could transmit a signal while reducing the echo, beating many of the major communications companies around the world that were trying to solve the same issue."
CSIRO credits the following inventors: Dr John O’Sullivan, Dr Terry Percival, Mr Diet Ostry, Mr Graham Daniels and Mr John Deane for creating this technology.
So, all explanation in below text you must compare with a frequency which is little below Wi Fi band in present time as is 2380MHz. This frequency today belong to wireless internet and in November 16th 1974 nobody on planet Earth know about wireless internet frequency but aliens use in that time and use in preset time.
So, if the Arecibo Message was transmitted on the wrong frequency, toward the wrong target too far away, exactly who was its intended audience?
I Rudolf (Boschnjak) Bošnjak believe the transmission was a powerful message to humans, about our place on the planet Earth and in the cosmos.
And it's become a landmark in human history, widely portrayed in popular culture and much discussed by all, despite its limited scientific value.
So, to that extent, the Arecibo Message transmission has been received, via wireless intranet systems we humans do not know noting about that time in 1974 year and was a resounding success about alien technology.
So, how aliend deliver message to from star cluster M13,
some 25,000 light years away and consisting of some 300,000 stars in the constellation of
Hercules.
But in 1974 a number of modifications had been carried out to the transmitter, enabling Arecibo telscope to broadcast signals at a power of up to 20 terawatts (1 terawatt = 1 trillion watts) and as an inaugural test of these improvements it was decided by SETI to transmit an encoded message to the heavens. This signal was aimed towards the globular star cluster M13, some 25,000 light years away and consisting of some 300,000 stars in the constellation of Hercules.
So, dear earthlings after reading all my words width large letters in different color I hope you finally comprehend and understand that all so call ALIEN MASSAGES ARE FROM FOLLOWING SOURCES:
FROM BELOW SURFACE OF PLANET EARTH
FROM SURFACE OF PLANET EARTH
FROM LOW ORBITS AROUND OF PLANET EARTH
FROM HIGH ORBITS AROUND OF PLANET EARTH
FROM GEOSTATINONARY ORBITS AROUND OF PLANET EARTH IN DIFFEREN FORMS AS
IN FORM OF ANALOG RADIO AND ANALOG TV FREQUENCIES BEFORE AND
IN PRESENT TIME IN 2015 YEAR AS DIGITAL RADIO AND DIGITAL TV FREQUENCIES
AND WI FI TRANSCEIVER SYSTEM IN FORM OF FREQUENCY HOPPING IN DIFFERENT BANDS AS IS GSM.
The reason for this is down to
mathematics. 1679 is the unique product of two prime numbers; 23 and 73. Any sufficiently
intelligent lifeform would no doubt look for unique, universal constructs - such as prime
numbers, chemical element frequencies and binary digits. Don't forget that because we
could be trying to communicate with an intelligence completely different to our own, we
cannot talk in terms of 'human' systems, such as centimetres, feet, decimal numbers etc.
Because ONLY the two prime
numbers 23 and 73, when multiplied together, produce 1679 there can only be a single way
to arrange the signal, if you were converting it into a matrix grid - 23 squares by 73
squares.
The original binary code is
shown in figure 1.
In order to fully understand
the message encoded in the transmission, it's essential to understand the binary code.
This is actually much simpler than our base 10, decimal system. Whereas in base 10 we
count from 1 to 9 and then carry 1 into the 10's column and start again in the units
column, until we've got 9 in the 10's column and 9 in the units column. Then we have to
carry 1 into the 100's column and start again in the 10's and units columns, and so on and
so on.
In binary each column goes up in
powers of 2, hence the columns are units, 2's, 4's, 8's, 16's etc. Because we can only
deal in 1's and 0's, we rapidly move up through the columns - because as soon as we exceed
1 we carry into the next column. For an example of counting in binary, see the table
bellow.
To go back to the original transmission of binary pulses (fig.1), by converting it into 23 columns of 73 rows we get the matrix shown in figure 2 (bellow):
You
can now see a graphical pattern depicted by the 1's and 0's of the code. For clarity I've
converted this into black squares (representing 1's) and white (empty) squares
(representing 0's). You can see that viewing it like this, makes the actual message a lot
clearer, as shown below, in figure 3 (bellow).
This is where a slight puzzle
becomes visible. By performing the steps described above, the literal translation of the
original pulses is on the left of figure 3. However, the image printed in a couple of my
books is that shown on the right of figure 3.
This is an exact left-right mirror image of my decoding. I suspect that this is possibly
an error which went un-noticed when the book went to print - although I have checked two
books which both depict the same pattern as shown on the right of figure 3.
The pattern which occurred in the
Chilbolton crop field, is the same image as shown in the books (ie. the one on the right
of fig.3 and the mirror image of the original decoding). This could imply that IF someone hoaxed the formation, they
copied the incorrect pattern printed in a book.
Alternatively, I may have converted the original pulses by mapping left to right when
converting into a 23x73 grid, instead of going from right to left - which personally
doesn't seem correct to my interpretation of the original binary sequence.
If anyone can explain this discrepancy, I would love to hear your comments. However, for the purposes of the rest of this article I shall refer to the pattern physically laid in the crop field. The results are the same because the actual code remains unchanged irrespective of whether it's the original or a mirror image anyway - as the binary coding remains unaltered.
Decoding the original message
The original message was
comprised of several 'sections', each depicting a particular aspect of 'our civilisation'.
At the top are binary representations of the numbers one through to ten, interestingly
showing the numbers eight, nine and ten as two columns. This shows anyone decoding the
message that we can specify that numbers too large to be written on a single line can be
'carried over'.
The next section contains the binary values 1,6,7,8 and 15 which indicate the atomic
numbers of the primary elements for life on Earth; Hydrogen, Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen and
Phosphorus respectively.
The larger section of three rows, represents the formulas for the sugars and bases in the nucleotides of DNA. Beneath this is a graphical representation of our DNA 'double helix' either side of a 'straight vertical bar' which indicates the number of nucleotides in DNA.
Directly below the DNA double helix is a small representation of us - humans - with a body and two arms and two legs (like a little stick man). On the left is a binary value of the population of Earth. This can be calculated as roughly 4.29 billion, which is roughly the population of the world, back in 1974. On the right of the humanoid form is a binary code for the height of humans.
Because we cannot communicate in 'human' measurements (such as feet and inches)
the height is represented in 'wavelength units'. As mentioned earlier, the actual message
was transmitted on 2380MHz. To convert this into a wavelength we divide into 300, to
obtain a wavelength in metres. 300/2380 = 0.12605042m = 12.6cm. This is our 'wavelength
unit'.
From the code for the height of a human, we can see that the value is 1110 in binary, or
14 in decimal. If we multiply 14 by our wavelength unit (12.6) we get 176.4cm, or roughly
5'9" - the average height of humans.
The next section is a simplified
representation of our Solar System - where we live. It shows the sun and nine planets,
roughly representative of size. By moving the third planet up slightly it highlights that
something is significant about the third planet from the sun - Earth.
The last section depicts the origin of the message itself - the Arecibo radio telescope, which is the curved structure. Underneath this, as the last two lines of the message, is another binary number. This time it's 100101111110 (split onto two lines in the centre) and equates to 2430 in decimal. Again, using our universal 'wavelength units' we get 2430*12.6cm which is 30618cm - or approx 1000', the diameter of the Arecibo radio dish.
Differences between the message sent in 1974 and the one received in 2001
.png)
(Left: what we sent in 1974 / Right: what we received in 2001)
What's different in
the Crop Formation?
After extensive analysis I have discovered nine major discrepancies between what we see in the crop field at Chilbolton and the original message that we transmitted to the stars in 1974. I shall leave any interpretation until later, but for now just highlight the differences. The exact detail of these changes couldn't be confirmed until I actually visited the formation on the ground, in order to accurately check the binary code - reading flattened crop as a 0 and standing crop squares as 1's
Rather
than point out the differences in order of importance or anything, I shall merely start at
the top of the pattern and work downwards.
The numbers 1 to 10 appear exactly the same in the formation.
However the atomic numbers indicating the prevalent elements making up life on
Earth, has an additional value inserted into the binary sequence. This is precisely added
in the correct location, and in the original binary code (therefore it can't be a
mistake). Decoding from the crop formation, this additional element has an atomic number
of 14 = Silicon.
Moving down, the next change is an obvious one
- consisting of an extra strand on the left side of the DNA double-helix. Another, less
obvious, change is in the binary coding of the number of nucleotides in DNA itself (in the
center). If you look in the diagram above, I've highlighted the changes more accurately on
the right, by using red squares and outlines to indicate which 'digits' have been changed
in the crop formation.
There are quite significant changes to the shape of the humanoid, which becomes almost 'alien-like' and to the diagram of the Arecibo dish. For clarity, I've not bothered going over these in red because the differences are easily apparent.
Either side of what is now an ET,
there are changes to both the 'population' figure and also the height value. The latter is
now 1000 in binary, or 8. If we multiply this by the original 'wavelength unit' we get
8*12.6cm = 100.8cm which is roughly 3'4" - interesting, because this would correlate
with ET witness accounts.
Below this we notice additional
changes to the Solar System chart. The third planet from the sun is not the only one
'highlighted' now. The fourth and fifth are as well. The fifth even appears to be
emphasised even more, with three additional 'pixels'.
Lastly, what was representative of the Arecibo
transmitter in the original message is even more cryptic and would imply a diagrammatic
version of the formation which appeared in the same field at Chilbolton last year, in
2000. This can be viewed in my database, reference uk2000ee.
The binary code for the size of the
transmitter is also altered. I'll leave the reader to work out the new value.
(Writer:
Paul Vigay. Additions and correlations: Alexander Light)
What
does it all mean?
Almost exactly one year prior to this message, in the same crop, this formation
appeared:
This is clearly a representation of their "telescope", as depicted in the 2001 message.
II. Gray Extraterrestrial holding a disc
Sparsholt, Hampshire, England. August 21st, 2002.
The message within the disk was deciphered using the standard 8 bit binary code known as ASCII (American Standard Code for Information Interchange). The cipher starts at the center of the disk and spirals outward counter-clockwise, this is also the same read pattern that a compact disc or DVD uses.
Example of how lasers read CDs/DVDs:
Decoding the Message:
One more example:
III. The Message Translated:
The empty spaces represent the binary number of ZERO and the blocks represent the binary number ONE. Using this cipher we get the following message:
"Beware the bearers of false gifts and
their broken promises. Much
pain, but still time. Believe there is good out there. We oppose deception. Conduit closing. 0x07"
The binary code of 0x07 at the end of the message would produced a bell sound similar to that of an old typewriter / bell sound (Example: DING!).
Exact Construction:
(A) Beware the bearers of FALSE gifts & their BROKEN PROMISES.
(C) There
is GOOD out there.We OPpose DECEPTION.
CLOSING
(Ding!)
Is this a friendly message from benevolent beings?
The message sounds friendly enough and it's just what we want to hear. But personally, I'm almost certain that this is a deception, and you will see why. Those who study or already are in contact with extraterrestrials (or other benevolent beings), know that our Government collaborates with a malevolent specie of grays which we know as Zeta Reticulans or Reticulans (they inhabit a binary solar system known as Zeta Reticuli).
(Zeta Reticuli Stars seen in Google Sky 2011, showing a picture from 2007)
The Reticulans and the Alpha Draconians (commonly known as Reptilians) have been in contact with our Governments for ages. The Reticulans are responsible for all the abductions and mutilations (both human and animal), while the Reptilians are those behind our leaders. They are using our Governments to control and enslave our species.
If you are familiar with my work, you know that almost all my history lessons are connected to the Reptilians and their control over the human species. There are also two prominent constellations mentioned by our ancestors, and most of the times they are connected to the extraterrestrial "gods": The Pleiades and Orion's Belt. Even more interesting, the Illuminati are literally obsessed with these two constellations and what they represent.
(The Orion's Belt is composed of 3 Stars. Two of them are aligned, while the third is a little offset. Image from Google Sky 2011, showing a picture from 2007).
Now back to our crop formation picture:
Notice anything strange? How about the three Stars behind the Alien? They look like Orion's belt, but do they match its alignment?
As you can see it's a perfect match. But what does this mean? Are the alien visitors positive beings from/around the Orion Constellation or is this a malevolent trademark?
It's not easy to draw a safe conclusion, but my instinct says this is another
deception. Why would a benevolent specie want to connect a peaceful message to Orion's
Belt?
Few years ago an ancient painting was found in a cave in Uzbekistan:
Credit: Wayne Herschel)
A flying disc is clearly noticeable and bellow it an extraterrestrial being. The ET walks on a black & white floor, one of the most prominent Illuminati signs. In the foreground we can see an astronaut with broken helmet (or some kind of beast?). The astronaut/beast is holding a similar disc in his left hand. Maybe the painter had a vision about the upcoming events? Is the cave painting presenting an apocalyptic scenario?
If the character in the foreground is an astronaut with a broken helmet, then his head is being sucked out through the hole. May this represent a planet without an atmosphere? The ET in the background also seems to be wearing some kind of helmet.
We can also see sings of destruction and a large planet in the sky (about three times bigger than the Sun).
Only time will tell the truth. In the meanwhile, please be careful what you believe!
Stay balanced and loving and you will always find the true path.
Text and images from web page http://humansarefree.com/2011/02/two-most-important-alien-messages.html